WPA 3415 OF 2022
Vs.
Mr. Sandip Choraria, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner referring to Rule 138A of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 (for short the 2017 Rules) submitted that, sub-Rule (1)(a) to the said Rule 138A of the said 2017 Rules does not provide for production of the relevant invoice in physical form and whenever a person-in-charge of the conveyance carries the same, even in a electronic/digital form or in his mobile or in such devices carried by him, the same would suffice and the authority could not have claimed for production of the invoice in physical form. He further referring to the said sub-Rule (1)(b) submitted that, insofar as the e-way bill was concerned, the legislature while legislating the rule thought it fit to use the expression “physical form” as a mandatory pre-requisite, whereas insofar as the invoice was concerned, no such expression was used and as such, he submitted that, the invoice was not required to be produced in physical form in the event the same is produced dititally.
Mr. Bikramaditya Ghosh, learned counsel appearing for the respondents, submitted that from a reading of the provision laid down under sub-Rule 138A, it would be evident that, the person-incharge of the conveyance/vehicle should carry the invoice also in physical form for verification by the respondent authority, if required. Since in the instant case, the person-in-charge of the concerned conveyance was not carrying the invoice in physical form, the appeal was rightly rejected.
Considering the rival submissions of the parties and considering the materials on record, at the outset, this Court for the proper appreciation of the issue involved in this writ petition thinks it fit to quote the relevant provision
138A. (1) The person-in-charge of a conveyance shall carry-
From a plain reading of the said provision, it appeared to this Court that, the expression used in the heading of the Rule 138A is clear that “ documents and devices to be carried by a person-in-charge of the conveyance” which included under sub-Rule (1)(a), the invoice.
It is trite that the provision in a taxing statute has to be construed strictly and no benevolent interpretation is available while construing taxing statute.
When the said provision specifically provided for that documents and devices to be carried by the person-in-charge of a conveyance including the invoice, this clearly means that the invoice has to be carried in physical form and if required shall be produced in its physical form.
Considering the issue involved in this writ petition, this Court is of the firm opinion that an opportunity may be given to the petitioner to produce the relevant invoice/invoices before the statutory appellate authority, i.e., the respondent no.2 before taking a final decision on the issue to subserve justice to the petitioner also.
Case Name:- Reserve Bank of India (GST AAR Maharashtra) Appeal Number: Advance Ruling No. GST-ARA-117…
Conditional Waiver to Interest/ Penalty relating to demand raised u/s 73 of CGST Act, 2017-…
The Finance Bill 2024, introduced in Parliament on 23rd July 2024, proposes major changes in…
Amendment to Section 16 of CGST Act, 2017 The Finance Bill 2024, introduced in Parliament…
The Union Finance Minister, Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman on Tuesday, presented her Seventh consecutive budget speech.…
Magazine on Tax Update Part-5 (June-2024) || Online Publication-13.07.2024 Subscription Option Available Subscription for E-GST…